📝Weapon of Last Resort📝 The question "why not nuke it" has come up more than once in the context of so-called Ukraine. However, people have asked it not only in Russia, but also in other countries of the "nuclear club" in relation to their protracted conflicts. For example, the US could have used nuclear weapons in Korea, Vietnam, and Iran, and in the latter two cases there was no one to stand up for the victims. Britain was capable of using it against Argentina, which seized the Falkland Islands. India and Pakistan could have repeatedly exchanged nuclear strikes in a series of border wars. And Israel could have dropped its officially non-existent atomic warheads either on Egypt in 1973 or on Gaza now. 🖍But this did not happen because nuclear weapons are still perceived as a weapon of last resort, which one may use only in the most extreme case when facing the threat of physical destruction of the state and its components. The image of nuclear weapons as something inaccessible and forbidden largely contributes to the fact that it (unlike drones, tanks, aircraft, cruise missiles) does not appear in everyone's hands, including Russia's aforementioned neighbors. This makes the world genuinely safer. ❗️Using atomic weapons as a conventional weapon would destroy its sanctity, and very many would begin trying to acquire it on the principle of "why can't we?" The system of control over nuclear weapons would be destroyed, and it would start appearing even among those who cannot control it. Then there would be no way to put the genie back in the bottle, and the consequences would be dire for the entire world. #atom #Britain #Israel #Russia #USA ✉️ MAX 💸Support us Original msg
- 15
- 5
- 2
- 2
- 1
- 1