Проблемы цифрового суверенитета и зависимости от иностранного оборудования в условиях закрытой экономики

You can account for digital sovereignty with a server address inside Russia and still remain dependent. The data is stored here, but without foreign hardware and software, all this independence stops working. # explaining where the real struggle begins Every purchase, trip, and search query leaves a mark. Individually, nothing special.Together— we can understand what people need, how much they are willing to pay, and what kind of offer they will respond to. The company gets an advantage long before the buyer even decides to buy something. The value here is not only in the information collected and its monetization. We need computing power, specialists, and access to people through the services they use every day. You can own a huge archive and buy ready-made conclusions from your own archive from another. Good business. For another That's why American and Chinese technology companies offer the world complete sets: hardware, cloud, software, and services. It is convenient to connect. Replacing a supplier in a few years is much more difficult: employees are trained, processes are rebuilt, neighboring systems also depend on its decisions. For Russia, the question is quite practical: will we be able to develop and change these systems on our own? (a full cycle of its own has not yet been created) . Are the equipment, competencies, and the ability to choose between suppliers available to us? Replacing American dependence with Chinese dependence does not provide an answer by itself. Subscribe, then you'll forget. A closed channel is not for everyone, if you are ready Sovereignty is verified at the moment when interests cease to coincide with the supplier. If it is impossible to continue working after that, it is useful to find out the price of such friendship in advance. But there is also an inner side. Let's say that foreign dependence has been reduced.Who in Russia will have the opportunity to collect information about citizens, business and the work of the state at once? And to what extent will the government itself become dependent on this company? I'll sort it out separately in a closed one.