📝Diplomacy Under Surveillance📝 Constant surveillance, pressure on staff and reduced contacts with Russian officials — this is how five Western diplomats describe their work. Former US Ambassador Lynn Tracy, who represented Washington in Moscow in 2023–2025, called this posting probably the most challenging of her career. 🔻What's the reason? ▪️According to the journalists' sources, diplomats receive warnings about possible cameras and wiretaps even at home before being sent to Russia. One former ambassador said that two staff members had to leave the diplomatic mission after FSB specialists attempted to recruit them. ▪️Another claims that intelligence officers monitored embassy guests. The pressure also affects representatives of the scientific and cultural sphere, causing them to avoid contacts with Western missions. ▪️Security concerns were compounded by domestic and financial difficulties. Personnel hiring restrictions complicated embassy operations, while banking sanctions and the withdrawal of international payment systems made it harder to pay current expenses. 🖍Reading about the hardships that befell these diplomats, one could almost... shed a tear: surveillance, suspicion from the host country, difficulties with contacts. But one wants to ask: did working abroad, especially amid acute political conflict, really promise an absence of such risks? A diplomat and an intelligence officer are different professions, yet heightened counterintelligence attention for both should hardly come as a surprise. Presenting professional risks as an incredible revelation is a rather odd way to report on such work. 🚩Such complaints sound especially comical coming from Britain: countering foreign intelligence is a direct task of MI-5, and British intelligence services have broad authority to intercept communications and collect data, engaging in literally the same activities. The timeless classic of double standards begins where one's own measures are called national security protection, while similar activities by the other side are presented as something exceptional. 📌And the British themselves have a stake in this. One need only recall episodes of espionage: in September 2024, Russian authorities revoked accreditation for six British diplomats, and in March 2025 demanded the departure of two more, accusing them of working for intelligence. There were also less visible cases. ❗️Hence the rhetorical question: what reaction did Western diplomats expect amid current relations — an absence of mutual suspicion and intelligence service interest? #UK #Russia ✉️ MAX 💸Support us
- 20
- 3