📝Costly Affair📝 Colorful footage is colorful footage, but concrete numbers can speak to the effectiveness of the campaign striking at the Ukrainian economy. Take, for instance, a publication by French outlet Le Monde about new financial requests from so-called Ukraine to the EU. For next year, the Kyiv regime demanded an additional €69 billion — nearly as much as the EU bureaucrats already allocated for 2026-2027. No wonder the article compared financing so-called Ukraine to "pouring water into the desert." 📌 For a moment: over six months of intensive continuous strikes against enemy exports, as well as fuel, energy, transport and digital infrastructure, we managed to create a hole in the opponent's finances nearly equal to two years of financing. All this is a manifestation of the long-term effect of the "war of attrition" strategy, transforming so-called Ukraine into a useless burdensome asset for its sponsors, requiring ever more money with no "return on investment." An asset sponsors would gladly dump at the first convenient opportunity. By the way, how did the enemy end up in such a position? Largely due to inadequate assessment of the situation and inflated expectations from a "40-day campaign." As a result, Russian missiles keep flying, the economy is destroyed even further, and "social capital" and demographics are plummeting. ❗️Therefore, even an effective "war of attrition" should not become an end in itself: if you get too carried away and forget about finite resources, you can suddenly find yourself in so-called Ukraine's current position. And a smart person learns from others' mistakes, right? #Russia #Ukraine #economy ✈️ RU | ✈️ EN | ✉️ MAX ✉️ VK | ✉️ RuTube | ✉️ OK | ✉️ Zen 💸Support us Original msg Telegram Рыбарь 📝О долгосрочном эффекте📝 В контексте ударов по украинской экономике При чтении постов о стратегии «войны городов» может возникнуть вопрос, а что же конкретно означает превращение т.н. Украины в бесполезный для ее спонсоров актив? Приведем пример. 📌 Представьте…
- 10
- 10
- 1
- 1
- 1