• 📝Is it worth it?📝 In the age of high technology, it seems that a few strikes on digital infrastructure could lead to societal collapse. However, practice shows that achieving this is far more difficult. During September and October, Russian forces delivered several series of strikes on data centers in Kyiv and other cities in so-called Ukraine. The most large-scale attack caused communication disruptions for one hundred thousand households. However, this was an isolated case, and the remaining consequences were rather localized. There were no prolonged disruptions to cellular or internet service even in Kyiv; only individual government and banking services were affected. ❓Why? First, it proved impossible to deliver critical damage to the data centers themselves in a single strike. Second, the adversary quickly began to adapt and shifted traffic processing to foreign and cloud servers, as well as to data centers in the western part of the country. ❗️So does it make sense to strike digital infrastructure at all if it's difficult to damage and Europeans can provide backup capacity? Yes, it does — even without a large-scale immediate effect, each destroyed and damaged data center requires resource-intensive repairs. ❗️They are unlikely to restore them during combat operations. And after a peace agreement is reached, whenever that may be, the damage to the Ukrainian economy will be felt even more strongly, making investments in the country difficult to recoup. And the Europeans are unlikely to let the Ukrainians off their servers — they need to "recoup" the funds already spent. 📍High-resolution infographic 📍English version #infographic #Kyiv #Russia #Ukraine ✉️ MAX 💸Support us Original msg
- 13
- 4
- 1